The strong defense in favor of Charles Darnay's acquittal is not related to his resemblance to Sydney Carton or Mr. Stryver. Here are some reasons that could be used to defend Charles Darnay:
1. **Lack of substantial evidence**: One of the main reasons for his acquittal could be the absence of concrete evidence linking him to the crime he's accused of. Without solid proof, it would be difficult to convict him.
2. **Alibi or Witnesses**: Another defense could be the presence of a strong alibi or credible witnesses who can testify to his innocence or provide an account of his whereabouts during the time of the alleged crime.
3. **Character witnesses**: If Darnay has a reputation for honesty, integrity, and good moral character, character witnesses could be presented to vouch for his innocence and credibility.
4. **Legal technicalities**: Sometimes, legal technicalities or procedural errors in the handling of the case could be used as a defense to argue for his acquittal.
By focusing on these points, the defense could build a strong case to support Charles Darnay's acquittal, rather than relying on superficial factors like appearance or wealth.
