Respuesta :
Chimel v. California, a ruling by the highest court, supported unwarranted searches for weapons and evidence around people who have been properly detained (1969).
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is a part of the Bill of Rights, states that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable unwarranted searches searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, except upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be searched," which places restrictions on detained warrantless searches in the United States.
Agents of the British Empire were able to conduct home searches on detained colonists in the Thirteen Colonies with the help of general warrants. Such warrants gave its bearer the right to search at any time and in any location. They were perceived as abuses of power, which raised unwarranted searches tensions and ultimately sparked the American Revolution. Although the Fourth Amendment forbade all warrantless searches and general warrants, its interpretation and restrictions as well as the permissibility of warrantless searches in specific situations, such as during wartime, have played a significant role in the history of executive and judicial power in the United States.
Learn more about unwarranted searches here
https://brainly.com/question/13609588
#SPJ4
