Respuesta :
Due to the difficulty of "performing an experiment in an economic system," the use of theory and observation is more challenging in economics than it is in sciences like physics.
Why are observations felt more challenging in economics than in sciences?
In comparison to other sciences, such as physics, using theory and observation is more challenging in economics since it is challenging to run a control experiment in an economic system. They are pure sciences, including physics.
We grant them the designation because we have the ability to regularly use scientific procedures in our search for more unambiguous truths and to observe phenomena, conduct experiments, and duplicate experiments.
But even though we consider economics to be social science, it has problems with experimentation, replication, and the use of the scientific method.
However, social and human behavior have recurrently unstable and challenging to recreate stages, thus we cannot directly extract economic variables from those.
Due to the individual nature of each person, experiments on one cannot ever be repeated on another.
Therefore, economists frequently collect information from past instances of economic change to contradict their theories.
Therefore, neither the facts nor the hypotheses can be proven to be exact by conducting experiments with fictitious economic variables.
Hence, "performing an experiment in the economic system," is the correct answer.
Check out the link below to learn about theory and observations;
https://brainly.com/question/17463658
#SPJ4
