Nowadays many couples decide to have only one child. But at the same time, there are also big families where there are a lot of children. Are there differences between growing up as an only child or with sisters and brothers? Firstly the main advantage of being an only child is that parents are more focused on you: they have only to take care of you and they don't have to spend time with other sons and daughters. What is more, is that an only child can establish a strong relationship with his parents. Secondly, they have more money to spend for you because, for instance, they have to pay only for one's studies and they have to buy just things for you and what have you. Finally, an only child doesn't have to share things with brothers or sisters: probably he could have his room, a private computer and he doesn't have to queue at the bathroom in the morning. On the other hand, an only child could be a little pampered because of all these parents concentrations: accustomed to having a lot of attention and to receiving all that he wants he could grow up in the wrong way. It's also true to say that for these reasons an only child could be repressed by his father and mother: it is a fact that frequently the first son has often less freedom than the others and probably for an only child is the same. What is more, is that an only child grows up a little more alone: he can't play with his brothers and sisters, he can't share the scoldings, and he can't know the relevance of the eternal brotherly love. In conclusion, being an only child has advantages and disadvantages but it cannot be denied that the main role is conducted by the parents: it's certainly relevant to the way only children are raised.
pls give brainliest
HOPE IT HELPS <3
