1. Women are directly fitted for acting as the nurses and teachers of our early childhood by the fact that they are themselves childish, frivolous and short-sighted; in a word, they are big children all their lifelong...." --Arthur Schopenhauer, Studies in Pessimism, "Of Women"
Is this an argument? Explain why this is a problem question, and write a short paragraph justifying your answer

this is a problem question because it pushes the stereotype that women are supposed to be nurturing and gentle. The text also uses very problematic language when describing the actions of women calling them childish, frivolous and short-sighted.

Answer Link

anthougo anthougo · Answer 2 · 2021-10-05T15:06:02+02:00

This statement by Arthur Schopenhauer is not an argument. The ingredients for making an argument are lacking conspicuously.

An argument proves a claim or thesis with evidence. An argument is usually laid out in a logical pattern. Finally, an argument has a conclusion, which is a product of the logical analysis.

What is presented in Arthur Schopenhauer's statement above is simply a questionable conclusion, which is lacking in logical reasoning. It is contestable because many people know the qualities of women, especially when it comes to the giving of healthcare and the education of the child.

Women are known for their patience, which is not childish. Women provide so much needed care at home and in institutions, so they cannot be frivolous. Women are rather fore-sighted instead of being described as short-sighted. They do not want to produce results that do not last.

Thus, the conclusion of Arthur Schopenhauer is too pessimistic and lacking in merit.

Read more about the role of women in the workplace at https://brainly.com/question/12459365 and https://brainly.com/question/22753191