binnieohhoo
contestada

NEED ASAP (BRAINLIEST FOR BEST ANSWER) Compare the two articles below again, and then answer the questions that follow.

In your own words, evaluate the objectivity of each article. Where can you see the authors’ personal biases? Where can you see an objective delivery of facts? What is the central message of each article?

NEED ASAP BRAINLIEST FOR BEST ANSWER Compare the two articles below again and then answer the questions that follow In your own words evaluate the objectivity o class=

Respuesta :

leo219

Answer:

The author is really bias and on Clifford High School side, the actual facts are in the argument that happened.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

The journalist for Clifford is more biased for their team, whereas the journalist for Waterford was more factual.

Explanation:

In the news clipping for Clifford High, the journalist explained the situation from the game poorly. They also gave an unacceptable amount of blind praise to their home team and used informal language to express their thoughts on the matter. The journalist for Waterford gave a more detailed and factual recollection of the incident. They managed to state the events as they presumably happened, and they did not show their opinions and biases.

Otras preguntas