contestada

Frank has thirty years of service as a manager for his company. He remembers when managers had almost complete freedom to fire workers. Frank thinks this is only fair. "After all," Frank points out, "workers quit whenever they get a better offer. Shouldn't managers have as much freedom to fire workers as the workers have to quit

Respuesta :

peaceazuka

Answer:

A proper documentation process stipulates the conditions for firing and resignation. If this provision is not met, managers should not fire their employer and employees should not resign even though they get a better offer elsewhere.

However, conditions differ in the case of "at will" employment.

Explanation:

What that Frank noticed within thirty year of service where managers had almost complete freedom to fire workers is called "at will employment".

It is not advisable for managers to fire workers at will for the following reasons:

  1. It hinders communication in the workplace as a workers will tread too cautiously.
  2. It will retain incompetent managers at the detriment of the entire company.
  3. It will cause poor retention of quality staff.

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": employment at will.

Explanation:

Employment at will refers to a contract termination approach by which managers can suddenly decide to end employees' contracts without prior warning and objective reason. Managers have absolute control over their payrolls with this doctrine and do not have any barrier at the moment of asking certain employees to definitely leave their firms.

This situation could lead to discriminatory practices regulated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

Otras preguntas