Read the argument below and answer the question that follows.
Everyone else passed the class, so it should be easy for you to pass as well.
Which kind of logical fallacy is being committed in this argument?
popular appeal
personal attack
non sequitur
appeal to a lack of evidence

Respuesta :

The logical fallacy that is committed in the given argument is popular appeal.

Explanation:

Popular appeal (also called argumentum ad populum or argumentum ad numerum) involves the use of the popularity of a premise or proposition (in this case, an occurrence) to prove its truthfulness. Because of our common sense, we believe that something that is widespread is good, true, or valid. That is why it's sometimes difficult to spot this logical fallacy. In the given case, an individual's capability is equated with others because everyone else passed the exam. According to this claim, there is no reason for anything to be different in an individual's case simply because that occurrence is not common.

Personal attack (argumentum ad hominem) is a fallacy that occurs when someone doesn't provide arguments against the other person's ideas but attacks the person themselves.

Non sequitur (deductive fallacy) is an invalid argument the conclusion of which is not supported by its premises.

Appeal to lack of evidence (also called appeal to ignorance - argumentum ad ignorantiam) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone claims that something is true because it has not yet been proven false.

Learn more about the red herring logical fallacy here: https://brainly.com/question/9575649

#LearnWithBrainly